Download fulltext HTML
Djatnika, T. (2020). Conventional Market Brand Equity: How It Affects Visiting Intention. KnE Social Sciences, 4(14), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i14.7913

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i14.7913

statistics

  • 54 Abstract Views
  • 51 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Tjetjep Djatnika

    Tjetjep Djatnika

    Marketing Study Program, Business Administration Department, Politeknik Negeri Bandung (POLBAN), Bandung, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Nov 11, 2020

Conventional Market Brand Equity: How It Affects Visiting Intention

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (IC-HEDS) 2019 / Pages 543–553

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the power of brand equity at a culinary centre in a traditional retail marketplace, assessing whether branding encourages customer visits. Questioners are distributed to visitors. 211 respondents competed the questionnaire survey forms correctly. The collected data were processed statistically using SmartPLS Version 3. The result of analysis reveals that the familiarity of the brand name directly influences brand associations in terms of service, product quality, price policy, and physical environment. Brand associations affect brand trust, and this, in turn, directly affects visit intention. Surprisingly, even though the physical environment of the marketplace has already been modernised by the local government through its revitalisation program, it is not effective in attracting customers. The study suggests that the intention to visit the marketplace stems from the brand name rather than the physical environment of the marketplace. Therefore, the marketplace should focus on developing a strong brand equity, then developing the favourable brand associations and building brand trust to ensure a steady flow of customers.


Keywords: brand awareness, brand associations, brand trust, purchase/ visit intention

References
[1] Humas.Bandung. (2018, April). Retrieved from https://humas.bandung.go.id/public-relations/news/ 2019-04-09/there-are-705-modern-markets.

[2] Kim, H. R. (2015). Culture and Tourism-Oriented Local Traditional Market Strategies in Korea. Presented at Proceeding of the First European Academic Research Conferences on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (EAR15 Italy Conference).

[3] Tabloid Bintang. (2018, March). Retrieved from https://www.tabloidbintang.com/2018-03-26/culinarytourism/hang-out/read/96287/3-traditional market-modern-concept-in-bandung-city.

[4] Prastyawan, A., et al. (2016). Revitalization of Traditional Markets into a Modern Market in the Perspective of local Governance Theory. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR- JHSS), vol. 20, issue 9, pp. 01-06.

[5] Pikiran-rakyat. (2017, May). Retrieved from https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/bandung-raya/2017-05-22/ sarijadi-market-operates with contemporary- modern-concept-operates-today-401671.

[6] Kilasdaerah.kompas. (2017, May). Retrieved from https://www.kilasdaerah.kompas.com/bandung/read/ 2017-05-24/112800528/the-apperance-of-sarijadi- market-from-untidy-to-become-modern-look.

[7] Jabar.tribunnews. (2018, May). Retrieved from https://jabar.tribunnews.com/2018-05-21/lowperforming-market-during-ramadhan-month-tenants-blamming-it.

[8] Hermawan, F., et al. (2018). Model of Indonesian Traditional Market Revitalisation: Case Study of Five Metropolitan Cities in Java Island, Advanced Science Letters, vol. 24, pp. 3146-3151.

[9] Suryadi, D. (2015). The Impact of Brand Equity towards Purchase Intention on PT. X’s Candy. iBuss Management, vol. 3, issue 2, pp.1-8.

[10] Showrav, D. G. and Nitu, R. J. (2018). The Influence of Brand Equity on Customer Intention to Pay Premium Price of the Fashion House Brands, Managements Science Letters, vol. 8 pp. 1291-1304.

[11] Anselmsson, J., et al. (2017). An Integrated Retail Image and Brand Equity Framework: Re- examining, Extending, and Restructuring Retailer Brand Equity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 38, pp. 194-203.

[12] Aydin, G. and Ulegin, B. (2015). Effect of Consumer-Based Brand Equity on Purchase Intention: Considering Socioeconomic Status and Gender as Moderating Effects. Journal of Euromarketing, vol. 24, pp. 107-119.

[13] Farjam, S. and Hongyi, X. (2015). Reviewing the Concept of Brand Equity and Evaluating ConsumerBased Brand Equity (CBBE) Models. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, vol. 1, issue 8, pp. 12-29.

[14] Gunawardane, N. R. (2015). Impact of Brand Equity towards Purchasing Decisions: A Situation on Mobile Telecommunication Service of Sri Lanka. Journal of marketing Management, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 100-117.

[15] Alexandra, Z. and Cerchia, A. E. (2018). The Influence of Brand Awareness and Other Dimensions of Brand Equity in Consumer‘s Behavior: The Affordable Luxury Strategy. “Ovidius” University Annals. Economic Sciences Series, vol. XVIII, issue 1.

16] Su, J. and Chang, A. (2018). Factors Affecting College Students’ Brand Loyalty Toward Fast Fashion: A Consumer-Based Brand Equity Approach. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 90-107.

[17] Lee, S. H. (2018). A Scale Development of Retail Equity. Sustainability, vol. 10, pp. 3924.

[18] Mohammad, A. A. S., (2017), the Impact of Brand Experiences, Brand Equity, and Corporate Brandingon Brand Loyalty: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Sciences, vol. 7, issue 3, pp. 58-69.

[19] Jara, M. (2018). Retail Brand Equity: Measurements through Brand Policy and store Formats. American Journal of Industrial and Business management, vol. 8, pp. 579-596.

[20] Omoregbe, O. O. (2017). Brand Equity and Purchase Intention among Mobile Phone Users in Benin City. Lapai Journal of Management Science, vol. 7, issue 2.

[21] Shahid, R. B. (2017). Building Strong Brand Equity of Supermarkets in the Context of Bangladesh, International. Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, vol. 5, issue 6.

[22] Wong, K. K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using Smart PLS, Marketing Bulletin, vol. 24.

[23] Ali, F., et al. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 30, pp. 514-538.

[24] Hair, J. F., et al. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 40, pp. 414-433.

[25] Hair, J. F., et al. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

[26] Tenenhaus, M., et al. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 48, pp 159 - 205.

[27] Daryanto, A., et al. (2010). Getting a Discount or Sharing the Cost: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Consumer Response to Service Pricing Schemes. Journal of Service Research, vol. 13, pp. 153-167.

[28] Hair, J. F., et al. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review, vol. 26, pp. 106-121.

[29] Hair, J. F., et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, Pearson Prentice Hall.

[30] Hair, J. F., et al. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 19, pp. 139-152.